IT & Security Audit
Compliance preparation gets you ready to be assessed. Audit establishes whether the controls you believe are running actually are.
We test control design and operating effectiveness, gather the evidence, and report what holds and what does not. The work is done to audit standards by certified auditors — which matters when the report has to satisfy somebody other than you.

Four reasons organisations commission an audit
An external assessor is coming
You would rather find the gaps yourself, while there is still time to close them, than have someone else find them for you.
You have internal audit obligations
A committee or a board requires periodic assurance over IT controls, and the expertise to deliver it is not in house.
Nobody has verified the controls
They were implemented, documented and then left. Whether they still operate is genuinely unknown.
A customer wants evidence
A contract or questionnaire requires independent confirmation that specific controls are in place and working.
Scope is set with you, from the areas that carry the risk
Access and identity controls
Provisioning, review, revocation and privileged access. The area that fails most often, because leavers are quieter than joiners.
Change management
Whether changes are authorised, tested and traceable — and whether the emergency route has quietly become the normal one.
Backup and recovery
Not whether backups run, but whether restoration has been proven and within what tolerance.
Monitoring and logging
Whether the events that matter are captured, retained for as long as required, and reviewed by someone.
Third-party and outsourced controls
What your providers are contractually obliged to do, and what evidence you hold that they do it.
Control framework alignment
Testing against the framework you are held to, whether that is ISO 27001, a regulatory expectation or a customer requirement.
Evidence, not assertion
Agree scope and criteria
Which controls, measured against which framework, and what constitutes passing. Settled in writing before fieldwork begins.
Test design
Whether the control, as designed, would actually achieve its objective. A well-run control aimed at the wrong thing still fails.
Test operation
Sampling actual activity over the period to establish whether the control ran consistently, not just on the day someone looked.
Report
Findings with evidence, rated by consequence, and written so that both the control owner and the audit committee can use the same document.
What you receive
- An audit report covering control design and operating effectiveness, with findings supported by the evidence tested
- A documented testing basis — what was sampled, over what period, and against what criteria
- Management actions agreed with the control owners rather than issued at them
- A remediation tracker you can carry into the next cycle and report against
- A summary for the board or audit committee in language that does not require a technical reader
Timing and cost
Cost depends on how many controls are in scope, how many systems and locations they span, and the state of your existing evidence. Where documentation is current and owners are identified, fieldwork moves quickly; where it is not, reconstructing it is the bulk of the work.
We do not publish packages or rates. Every engagement begins with a short call, followed by a written scope and a fixed price for that scope before any work starts.
What we need to scope it
Which framework you are held to, what triggered the requirement, whether an audit has been done before, and who owns the controls today.
Common questions
Is this the same as your compliance service?
Can you issue a SOC 2 or ISO certificate?
Can you audit us if you built the controls?
How disruptive is fieldwork?
What if we fail?
Tell us what has to be assured, and to whom
The audience for the report usually determines the shape of the engagement. Thirty minutes is enough to establish both.
Start with a scoping call